Sunday, February 17, 2019

Buffy the Vampire Slayer Essay -- Television TV Show Essays

Buffy the Vampire SlayerWhile the first seasons of Buffy are structured around an external threat seeking to corrupt the ordinance of the world, later the source of the threat becomes increasingly internal, and the characters must(prenominal) embrace a side of themselves which is evil, irrational, or dangerous. When Giles go throughs an arguably truthful Ben, he does not recede the moral ambiguity that Willow encounters when she kills a guilty Warren. Willow has to uphold with an evil internal to her in a way Giles does not, and this apparent contrariety is the result of a general evolution of the series, rather than a mental image standard. The murder of Ben is comparable to the murder of Warren, point though Ben is mostly innocent and Warren is mostly guilty. They are both human, and their deaths are necessary to occlude further evil. Even though Ben cohabits the kindred body with the hell divinity Glory, he, as an indep closing curtainent being, is innocent of Glorys actions, as the Scoobies uniformly agree What about(predicate) Ben? He can be killed, right? I mean, I cognise hes an innocent, but, you know, not, like tick innocent. We could kill... a regular guy... (no we couldnt) God. Even the script directions (no we couldnt) show that the way Xander delivers these lines should emphasize the moral impossibility of killing Ben as a way of stopping Glory. Being Glory is to Ben what being the Key is to Dawn it could make him another(prenominal) but it cannot make him either good or bad on Glorys behalf. It is true that Ben is guilty of other things -- he mobilize the demon who kills (or merely finishes off) Glorys brain sucked victims and, in Listening to Fear, there is even a real chance that Joyce might get killed because of him (an event which Buffy prevents from happening). ... ...umans into vampires) at some point someone has to draw the line, and that is always going to be me. You get down on me for cutting myself off, but in the end the slayer is always cut off (Selfless). At the same time, she is the most ambiguous one, the one who is ready to cut all ties with family and friends and kill people she loves, if necessary (e.g., Angel). The requirement that she know exactly which side she must stay on (regardless of where those she loves are) gives her the responsibility to keep the other other at all costs -- even at the cost of becoming an other herself. This would be the moral equivalent of dying to save lives in The exhibit -- in this case, crossing over to the dark side in gild to prevent others from doing it. Paradoxically, she protects the line which separates good from evil by crossing it, by becoming more and more other.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.